Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1310/2024

Case between Krishna Traders vs Susmitha regarding plaint rejection

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Krishna Traders, represented by Naveen Kumar P T, filed a suit against the defendant, Susmitha. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff was absent and had not paid the necessary court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Naveen Kumar P T (50 years) Puthukulangara House, Edakkattuvayal P O, Arakkunnam, Ernakulam - 682 313

Defendants

Susmitha (47 years) House No: 5/46, Puthenveedu, BSS Road, Mattanchery, Kochi - 682 002

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and no balance court fee remitted.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases