Case Summary
The plaintiff, Krishna Traders, represented by Naveen Kumar P T, filed a suit against the defendant, Susmitha. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected as the plaintiff was absent and had not paid the necessary court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishna Traders
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Susmitha
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o Not Known
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kurian Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vysakh CS
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and no balance court fee remitted.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishna Traders vs Susmitha regarding plaint rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Krishna Traders vs Susmitha regarding plaint rejection