Case Summary
The case involves Krishna Rao, who runs a grocery business, against Ajithkumar, a local politician, seeking protection from eviction and interference in his business. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has been unlawfully threatening him to vacate the premises where he operates.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from forcefully evicting the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from forcefully evicting the plaintiff and from interfering with his business. The court found no further issues to adjudicate.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant admitted he would not evict the plaintiff by force, which led to no further issues for trial.
The defendant admitted he would not evict the plaintiff by force, which led to no further issues for trial.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant admitted he would not evict the plaintiff by force, which led to no further issues for trial.
The defendant admitted he would not evict the plaintiff by force, which led to no further issues for trial.
Supporting Evidence
Going through the plaint averments, there remains no issues for further adjudication in this case and that the entire relief as sought for by the plaintiff was undertaken by the defendant as stated above.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence this court is also of the opinion that no purpose will be served in proceeding further with this case. Considering the fact that there remain no further issues to be adjudicated in this case, the suit is decreed as follows: A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant, his men or agents or anybody acting under him from forcefully evicting the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Krishna Rao
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayanthi
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ashwin Rao
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajithkumar
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajeswari
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.T. Anil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Krishob K. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Varghese C. Kuriakose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ranimol M.T.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Susanth Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ally Paul Thottam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendant from forcefully evicting the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence this court is also of the opinion that no purpose will be served in proceeding further with this case.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Krishna Rao et al vs Ajithkumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Krishna Rao et al vs Ajithkumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction