Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 303/2023

Case between Krishna Kumar Nambiar vs M/s Spices Producer Company Limited et al regarding salary dues and employment termination.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-07-05
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Krishna Kumar Nambiar filed a suit against his former employer, M/s Spices Producer Company Limited, for unpaid salary and dues following his resignation. The plaintiff claims he is owed Rs. 96,983 and alleges wrongful termination, while the defendants argue the case is flawed due to misjoinder of parties and claim a lack of liability on their part.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting him Rs. 72,983 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realization. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff entitled to realize Rs. 72,983 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claims for unpaid salary were substantiated, although some adjustments were made.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) The plaintiff is found entitled to realize the sum of Rs. 72,983/- with interest of 6 percent per annum for the said sum from the date of the suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Krishna Kumar Nambiar (45 years) Flat no. C4, Blue Moon Apartments Annex, Kumaranasan Nagar, Palathuruthu, Kadavanthra, cochin – 683 020

Defendants

M/s Spices Producer Company Limited (Age not specified years) V.J.Tower, 2nd Floor, October road, Vytilla – 682 019 Jaimon N.R (44 years) Narivelil house, Bisonvalley P.O, Vytilla – 682 019 Get Big Pvt Ltd. (Age not specified years) V.J.Tower, 2nd floor, October road, Vytilla – 682 019 Jaimon N.R (44 years) Narivelil house, Bisonvalley P.O, Vytilla – 682 019

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of salary dues amounting to Rs. 72,983/- with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is found entitled to realize the sum of Rs. 72,983/- with interest of 6 per cent per annum for the said sum from the date of the suit till realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
No special reason is shown to deviate the normal rule as to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Employment Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of plaintiff's employment with the 1st defendant company.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of Suspension
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the suspension of the plaintiff from the defendant company.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Resignation Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
E-mail copy of the plaintiff's resignation from the defendant company.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pay-slips
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents supporting the monthly salary payable to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing communication between the plaintiff and the defendant regarding exit formalities.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent by the plaintiff demanding payment of dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of service of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the defendants which contained allegations against the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Handover Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document related to items handed over to the plaintiff at the time of employment.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/13/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases