Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1208/2018

Case between K.Rajkumar vs K.S.Muraleekrishna et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-08-02
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 day
Case Closed
Fri, 08/02/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.Rajkumar filed a suit against K.S.Muraleekrishna and others. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the case being dismissed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the case being dismissed.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent,no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Rajkumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.S.Muraleekrishna
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopal L Pillai
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.Rajalakshmi
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Corporation of Cochin
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala State Electricity Board
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.C.Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal K Charles
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju A.T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.S.Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Sunil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.T.Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishob K Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jaison Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.Rajkumar vs K.S.Muraleekrishna et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between K.Rajkumar vs K.S.Muraleekrishna et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/02/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won