Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1115/2017

Case between K.P.Gopinathan vs Premier Tyres workers Association et al regarding civil suit

Court
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-09-04
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 months
Case Closed
Wed, 09/04/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.P.Gopinathan filed a suit against Premier Tyres workers Association and others. The defendants indicated they do not wish to prosecute the case any further.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit as the defendant indicated they are not intending to pursue it further. The ex-parte decree passed previously remains absolute.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit as the defendant indicated they are not intending to pursue it further. The ex-parte decree passed previously remains absolute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants expressed no intention to contest the suit any further.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants expressed no intention to contest the suit any further.
Supporting Evidence
Defendant has stated in the memo that he is not intending to prosecute OS 1115/17 any further.

Judgment Evidence:

The exparte decreed passed by this court dated 17/03/2022 will remain absolute. Suit is thus decreed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.P.Gopinathan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Premier Tyres workers Association
Relation
represented by its General Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Election committee, Premier Tyres workers association
Relation
represented by its Convener
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.Manoharan
Party Age
55
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.N.Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu P Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.R.Prathish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.K.Sreevalsa Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The exparte decree passed by the court will remain absolute.
Evidence:
the exparte decreed passed by this court dated 17/03/2022 will remain absolute.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.P.Gopinathan vs Premier Tyres workers Association et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between K.P.Gopinathan vs Premier Tyres workers Association et al regarding civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/17/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/04/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won