Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.51/2024

Case between K.P.Abraham vs Eliyamma et al regarding partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-07-02
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 days
Case Closed
Wed, 07/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.P.Abraham filed a suit for partition against his siblings Eliyamma, K.P.Joseph @ Ouseph, Mary Joseph, and K.P. Xavier regarding their father's property. The plaintiff claims he is entitled to 4/5 share of the property after his siblings transferred their shares to him.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition, granting K.P.Abraham a 4/5 share of the property and allocating 1/5 share to the 4th defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit for partition, granting K.P.Abraham a 4/5 share of the property and allocating 1/5 share to the 4th defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that all parties are legal heirs and that the plaintiff is entitled to a larger share due to prior transfers.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that all parties are legal heirs and that the plaintiff is entitled to a larger share due to prior transfers.
Supporting Evidence
From the unchallenged evidence, it can be seen that plaintiff and defendant is entitled to get a decree of partition as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.P.Abraham
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Eliyamma
Party Age
81
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P.Joseph @ Ouseph
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Joseph
Party Age
73
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P. Xavier
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original settlement deed bearing No.49/2017, Original settlement deed No.1041/2023, Tax receipt, Death certificate of Pailo, Gift deed No. 3205/1969
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S.Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree for partition and possession of the plaint schedule properties
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original settlement deed bearing No.49/2017 issued from SRO Kaduthuruthy
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original settlement deed No.1041/2023 of SRO Kaduthuruthy
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 12.04.2023 of Manjoor, Village Office
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of Pailo, S/o Avira
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Gift deed No.3205/1969 of SRO, Kaduthuruthy
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
Case between K.P.Abraham vs Eliyamma et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between K.P.Abraham vs Eliyamma et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Thu, 06/27/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between P.K.Vijayan et al vs K.P Remanan et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Appachan @ Kuriakose vs Shaji Kurian et al regarding declaration of the easement by grant, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chellappan vs Santha regarding easement by declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Roy Joseph vs Tomy Joseph regarding partition and fixation of boundary.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won