Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 795/2018

Case between Kochurani Vincent vs Iype Joseph et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kochurani Vincent is the plaintiff and Iype Joseph along with others are the defendants. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not have representation in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and had no representation despite being given a last chance to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent and has no representation or appearance despite specific direction to appear as last chance no further time. Suit therefore dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kochurani Vincent (63 years years) 6B, Golden Residency, S.A Road, Cochin – 683 016

Defendants

Iype Joseph (65 years years) Kalluveetil House, Karihtala Desom, residing at Pankath House, C.C 29/1635 A, Jawahar Road, Vyttila Desom, Poonithura Village Poulose (Age not specified years) Parackal House, Paramelil road, Nazreth, Aluva, Pin - 683 101 The Goldern Residency Owners Association (Age not specified years) SA Road, Kadavanthra, Cochin-16

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Suit therefore dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases