Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 795/2018

Case between Kochurani Vincent vs Iype Joseph et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kochurani Vincent is the plaintiff and Iype Joseph along with others are the defendants. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not have representation in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and had no representation despite being given a last chance to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and had no representation despite being given a last chance to appear.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent and has no representation or appearance despite specific direction to appear as last chance no further time. Suit therefore dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kochurani Vincent
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Iype Joseph
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Poulose
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Goldern Residency Owners Association
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manoj R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pious Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blessy Mol P. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.T Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishob K Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas M Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Suit therefore dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kochurani Vincent vs Iype Joseph et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence
Case Code Year
Case between Kochurani Vincent vs Iype Joseph et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won