Case Summary
K.M Divan is the plaintiff claiming unpaid rent from GTL Infrastructure Ltd. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to pay rent due since November 2017, leading to a legal dispute.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 4,84,983/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay outstanding rent with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence regarding the rent arrears and the court found the defendant's claims unsubstantiated.
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence regarding the rent arrears and the court found the defendant's claims unsubstantiated.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence regarding the rent arrears and the court found the defendant's claims unsubstantiated.
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence regarding the rent arrears and the court found the defendant's claims unsubstantiated.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was examined as PW1. The evidence of PW1 and DW1, clubbed with Ext A1, point to a fact that the rent had not been paid from 01/11/2017 and that the defendant was evicted on 09/08/2021.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: a.The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 4,84,983/- (Rupees four lakh eighty four thousand nine hundred and eighty three only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest), upon this 4,84,983/- from the date of institution of the suit, till its realization from the defendant or from the assets of the defendant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.M Divan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- GTL Infrastructure Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Order in I.A No. 2/2020 in RCP No. 148/2019.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Basil Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ninan John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sivapriya Ajith
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sanjana Sara Varghese Annie
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajay Krishnan. S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gia Mathai Kandathil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 4,84,983/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: a.The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 4,84,983/- (Rupees four lakh eighty four thousand nine hundred and eighty three only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest)...
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as evidence and supports the plaintiff's claims regarding the order from the Rent Control Court.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between K.M Divan vs GTL Infrastructure Ltd. regarding money recovery
Case Code Year
Case between K.M Divan vs GTL Infrastructure Ltd. regarding money recovery