Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 136/2022

Case between K.K.Vinod vs SMS Sereniti – II Owners and Family Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
approximately-2 years 7 months
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.K.Vinod, the plaintiff, claims ownership and peaceful possession of his apartment and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against SMS Sereniti – II Owners and Family Association and its Secretary and President. The plaintiff alleges harassment and obstruction by the defendants, prompting this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the permanent prohibitory injunction as requested. The defendants are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's access to his apartment and from causing nuisance in the apartment complex.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants obstructing the plaintiff and his family.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the permanent prohibitory injunction as requested. The defendants are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's access to his apartment and from causing nuisance in the apartment complex.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided uncontroverted testimony and evidence supporting his claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided uncontroverted testimony and evidence supporting his claims.
Supporting Evidence
The uncontroverted testimony of the plaintiff as well as the documents marked would prove the case of the plaintiff. No averments in the written statement field by the defendants were supported by any evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. The defendants, their agents and supporters are restrained from locking the entrance gate as well as front door of the Apartment Complex by name SMS Sereniti-II, either from inside or outside so as to restrict and obstruct the entry of the plaintiff and his family into the plaint schedule Apartment.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.K.Vinod
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SMS Sereniti – II Owners and Family Association
Relation
represented by its Secretary, Susmi Mohan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Susmi Mohan
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suja Prakash
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Deed No. 4008/2018 dated 29.10.2018
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Kuriakose K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ramesh Cherian John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants, their agents and supporters are restrained from locking the entrance gate and front door of the Apartment Complex.
Evidence:
The defendants, their agents and supporters are restrained from locking the entrance gate as well as front door of the Apartment Complex by name SMS Sereniti-II, either from inside or outside so as to restrict and obstruct the entry of the plaintiff and his family into the plaint schedule Apartment.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained from causing any nuisance by letting children and adults play sports activities on the rooftop.
Evidence:
The defendants, their agents and supporters are restrained from causing any nuisance to the plaintiff and his family by letting children as well as adults to play football and other sports activities on the roof top of the plaint schedule apartment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the situation faced by the plaintiff and his family following the unauthorized locking of the front door of the Apartment Complex.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows playing of shuttle game by one of the inmates of the apartment complex.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Pendrive
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to present additional evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certificate under Section 63(4) of Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the evidence presented through the pendrive.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document submitted before the SHO, South Station, Ernakulam by the Plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued to the Secretary (in Charge) SMS Sereniti – II Owners and Family Association by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Printout
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Printout of the track consignment bearing no RL 801905490IN.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.K.Vinod vs SMS Sereniti – II Owners and Family Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between K.K.Vinod vs SMS Sereniti – II Owners and Family Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won