Case Summary
K.Krishnamma is the plaintiff and Latha and Sasi Menon are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the plaintiff did not appear in court after being specifically instructed to do so. Therefore, the suit is dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not represented continuously. There was specific direction in the previous posting date for the plaintiff to appear in person.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.Krishnamma
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Latha
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasi Menon
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.J.Joseph Panikkaserry
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N.K.Mohanlal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.Krishnamma vs Latha, Sasi Menon regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between K.Krishnamma vs Latha, Sasi Menon regarding dismissal for default