Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 351/2021

Case between K.K.Mohankumar vs A.D.Gopalashenoy regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-07-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.K.Mohankumar filed a suit against A.D.Gopalashenoy for a permanent prohibitory injunction concerning the construction of a compound wall on the property boundaries. The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit as there was no obstruction from the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed since the plaintiff reported no obstruction in construction. Each party is to bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the case due to lack of obstruction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K.K.Mohankumar (65 years years) Kalluthara house, Kathrikadavu, Kaloor. Kochi – 17

Defendants

A.D.Gopalashenoy (Age not specified years) Arakkapparambil House, Kovilvattom desom, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases