Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 469/2024

Case between Kizhakkethil Steel Rolling Mill vs The Director, GK Iron and Steel Co Ltd regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-09-18
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 09/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kizhakkethil Steel Rolling Mill is the plaintiff seeking to recover money from GK Iron and Steel Co Ltd for unpaid debts after the defendant defaulted on payments for goods purchased. The case proceeded ex parte as the defendant did not appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the amount due along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay the sum of 95,908/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the amount due along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the case with evidence that supported the claim for the amount due.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 95,908/- (Rupees ninety five thousand nine hundred and eight only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 79,669/- (Rupees seventy nine thousand six hundred and sixty nine only) from the date of decree till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kizhakkethil Steel Rolling Mill
Relation
null
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Director, GK Iron and Steel Co Ltd
Relation
null
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Power of Attorney, Ledger Account, Copy of the e mail, Copy of Lawyers Notice, Returned cover with A/D Card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Rabeez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reni Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anakha Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rizwan T Nazar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Treesa Sony Thoppil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adithya Benzeer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of ₹95,908 with interest.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 95,908/- (Rupees ninety five thousand nine hundred and eight only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 79,669/- (Rupees seventy nine thousand six hundred and sixty nine only) from the date of decree till its realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Power of Attorney submitted by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger Account of transactions to establish the amounts due.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another Ledger Account relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Email Correspondence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email related to the transactions and payments.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Lawyers Notice sent to the defendant regarding the unpaid dues.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned cover with acknowledgment card related to previous correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kizhakkethil Steel Rolling Mill vs The Director, GK Iron and Steel Co Ltd regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kizhakkethil Steel Rolling Mill vs The Director, GK Iron and Steel Co Ltd regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 09/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M R Gopalakrishnan Nair vs C V Eliyamma regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mathew Uthup vs Holy Family Catholic Church et al regarding family vault allotment.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kuruvilla Joseph vs Asha Jayadevan regarding recovery of money as arrears of rent.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs James E. Joseph et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Omana Markose vs P.O Devarsykutty, Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won