Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 509/2023

Case between Kiran B Raj vs C. Gopalakrishnan regarding dismissal of suit for absence

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kiran B Raj, and the defendant, C. Gopalakrishnan, were involved in a suit which was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence despite specific direction to appear personally in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court. The plaintiff failed to represent themselves despite being directed to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court. The plaintiff failed to represent themselves despite being directed to appear.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 16.01.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kiran B Raj
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o. Late Babu Raj
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o. A.P Menon
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.B Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.T Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Morely Stalin James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vipin D.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Daniel A.j
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manisha V.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anna Rose Nambadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kiran B Raj vs C. Gopalakrishnan regarding dismissal of suit for absence
Case Code Year
Case between Kiran B Raj vs C. Gopalakrishnan regarding dismissal of suit for absence

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won