Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 509/2023

Case between Kiran B Raj vs C. Gopalakrishnan regarding dismissal of suit for absence

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kiran B Raj, and the defendant, C. Gopalakrishnan, were involved in a suit which was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence despite specific direction to appear personally in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court. The plaintiff failed to represent themselves despite being directed to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 16.01.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kiran B Raj (38 years) Kalikodu, Kailasan House, Kappakada, Punnapra P.O, Alappuzha, PIN : 688 004

Defendants

C. Gopalakrishnan (60 years) D.D Nest Apartment Tower -2, G-11, Thammanam, Pullepady Road, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, PIN: 682 017

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases