Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 568/2016

Case between K.I. Philomina et al vs K.I. Francis regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 06/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involved K.I. Philomina and others as plaintiffs against K.I. Francis as the defendant. The plaintiff expressed a lack of interest in proceeding with the case, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the memo filed by the plaintiffs indicating their disinterest in proceeding. Consequently, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the memo filed by the plaintiffs indicating their disinterest in proceeding. Consequently, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs voluntarily decided not to pursue the case further.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for plaintiff submits that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with this case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.I. Philomina
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.I. Elizabeth
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.I. Mary Stella
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.I. Mary Grace
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.I. Francis
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N. Ratheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suma Ratheesj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreejith C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arvind Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.T. Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kabil T. Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with this case; suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for plaintiff submits that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with this case. Filed a memo to that effect. Heard. Memo accepted. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.I. Philomina et al vs K.I. Francis regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between K.I. Philomina et al vs K.I. Francis regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won