Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 434/2025

Case between Khalid C.K vs Pathrose et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Khalid C.K filed a suit which he later decided to withdraw. Despite the intention to withdraw, the plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Khalid C.K was dismissed for default due to his absence in court and failure to file a withdrawal petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Khalid C.K was dismissed for default due to his absence in court and failure to file a withdrawal petition.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to represent the case, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to represent the case, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Not represented. No petition to withdraw the suit seen filed as submitted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khalid C.K
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pathrose
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rosy Pathrose
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunjuabdulla
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammad Elavankandi
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Unnais Abdu Rahiman
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nihal Kottalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Farsan Latheef C.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.K.Subeesh Hrishikesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dominic M John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nandana R Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Khalid C.K vs Pathrose et al regarding withdrawal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Khalid C.K vs Pathrose et al regarding withdrawal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won