Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 52/2023

Case between Khadeeja Beevi vs Nithya Sailesh et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Khadeeja Beevi filed a suit against Nithya Sailesh and others. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not ready or present for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khadeeja Beevi
Party Age
29
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nithya Sailesh
Party Age
40
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jacob Koshy
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajith
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Mohammed Rafeeq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Philip T. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas T. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Achu Shubha Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jaisy T. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amala Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gayathri Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kallayni G Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sapna Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Urmila M. G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thahseem A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not ready or present for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not ready or present for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Khadeeja Beevi vs Nithya Sailesh et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Khadeeja Beevi vs Nithya Sailesh et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won