Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 207/2019

Case between K.G.Lekha vs Vyapar Mandir Palarivattom Pvt Ltd. et al regarding withdrawal of suit

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves K.G.Lekha as the plaintiff and Vyapar Mandir Palarivattom Pvt Ltd. along with its managing director and others as defendants. The suit was withdrawn by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn after both parties were represented in court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn after both parties were represented in court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff was able to successfully withdraw the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff was able to successfully withdraw the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The judgment states the suit was withdrawn by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.G.Lekha
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o Melvin George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vyapar Mandir Palarivattom Pvt Ltd.
Relation
Represented by its Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.M.Babu
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o Madhavan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.V.Geevar
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o Vareed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by its Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Philip T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas T Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Salma T Muhammed
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amala Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Shaj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thareeq Amar K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arunchand
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joseph Mary Das
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jilal C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lakshmy S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.G.Lekha vs Vyapar Mandir Palarivattom Pvt Ltd. et al regarding withdrawal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between K.G.Lekha vs Vyapar Mandir Palarivattom Pvt Ltd. et al regarding withdrawal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won