Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by their Secretary, filed a suit against the defendants, including a President and other members of an organization, regarding the dismissal of their case for default. The court ultimately dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were absent and there was no proof affidavit filed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for default due to their absence and lack of required affidavit evidence. The dismissal was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and did not submit necessary documentation.
The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and did not submit necessary documentation.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and did not submit necessary documentation.
The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and did not submit necessary documentation.
Supporting Evidence
Since the suit is of the year 2013 and the plaintiffs were absent with no proof affidavit filed, the court ruled in favor of the defendants.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.K.Shanmughan
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A.K.Ajayan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anil Kumar
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.P.Vijayan
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C.A.Pradeepan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.K.Sadanandan
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abraham John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sindu M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh Kumar T.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reshma Ratnalal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.B.Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.T.Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of filed proof affidavit.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha, Thiruvankulam Branch No. 83 et al vs V.P.Vijayan et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha, Thiruvankulam Branch No. 83 et al vs V.P.Vijayan et al regarding suit dismissal for default