Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS. No.04/2021

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vipin Venugopal et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha NA
Order Date
2024-03-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, has filed a suit against the defendants for recovery of a loan amounting to ₹96,850. The defendants failed to appear before the court despite receiving summons.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹96,850 along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay ₹96,850 with interest @ 11% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its contentions through evidence and affidavit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: a) The defendant shall pay ₹96,850/- (Rupees Ninety Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty only) with interest @ 11% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kerala Gramin Bank (Age not specified years) Kolenchery Branch, Represented by its Branch Manager.

Defendants

Vipin Venugopal (30 years) Athikuzhiyil House, Meempara P O, Pariyaram Kara, Aikkaranadu South Village, Kolenchery - 682308. Vishnu V J (31 years) Vettickanapadickal House, Manamthadam, Puthencruz P O, Thiruvaniyoor Village, Ernakulam - - 682308.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is ordered to pay the outstanding amount with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: a) The defendant shall pay ₹ 96,850/- (Rupees Ninety Six Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty only) with interest @ 11% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the loan request made by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show the terms and conditions under which the loan was sanctioned.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the loan agreement executed by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: The guarantee agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was relevant to establish the security provided for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Guarantee covering letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to support the guarantee agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: The letter of confirmation of balance and acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed the outstanding balance acknowledged by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: The copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish that demand notices were served on the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was related to the acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Return postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supported the notice and acknowledgment processes.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided evidence of the account status and outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Quick Facts

Location
Kolenchery
Case Filed
Thu, 05/28/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases