Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.733/2024

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sobhitha.A.K et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank is the plaintiff seeking repayment of a loan amount from the defendants, Sobhitha.A.K and Abdul Rasheed. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite multiple acknowledgments of debt.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendants to pay the loan amount along with interest and costs. The interest rate was set at 9% instead of the claimed 16%.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay a sum of Rs.4,20,789/- with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the defendants to pay the loan amount along with interest and costs. The interest rate was set at 9% instead of the claimed 16%.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case through unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved its case through unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff is proved by the unchallenged oral testimony of the PW1 and the documents tendered by him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The defendants are hereby directed to pay a sum of Rs. 4,20,789/- (Rupees four lakhs twenty thousand seven hundred and eighty nine only) with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from the date of suit till date of decree and thereafter at 6 per cent till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sobhitha.A.K
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Rasheed
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand promissory note dated 29.11.2008, Acknowledgment of Debt dated 01.08.2011, various loan documents.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Balakrishnan.C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the sum of Rs. 4,20,789/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby directed to pay a sum of Rs. 4,20,789/- (Rupees four lakhs twenty thousand seven hundred and eighty nine only) with interest at the rate of 9 per cent from the date of suit till date of decree and thereafter at 6 per cent till realisation.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants shall pay the cost of the proceeding to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The normal rule is that cost shall follow event.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To establish the loan agreement between the bank and the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To confirm the delivery of the demand promissory note.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for Open Cash Credit/Retail Credit Card/Swarozgar Credit Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To specify the terms of the cash credit facility availed by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Application for Restructure Facility
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To evidence the request by the defendants for restructuring the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the restructured loan facility dated 15.03.2012.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To confirm the delivery of the restructured demand promissory note.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Restructured Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To provide evidence of the loan restructuring approval.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: True copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To notify the defendants regarding the repayment demand.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To detail the financial transactions related to the defendants' accounts.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To signify acknowledgment of debt from the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To confirm acknowledgment of debt dated 14.03.2012.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt dated 06.01.2015 by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt dated 31.08.2017.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt dated 25.07.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of debt dated 15.12.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A15

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sobhitha.A.K et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sobhitha.A.K et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Bank et al vs M/s. A J Advisory Services et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won