Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 262/2016

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sajan P.G. et al regarding restoration of Execution Petition.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-01-08
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Code No.
262
Case Closed
Wed, 01/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank is the decree holder represented by its manager against Sajan P.G. and others. The case concerns the restoration of an Execution Petition that was previously dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration of the Execution Petition that had been dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of Execution Petition 24/2022.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration of the Execution Petition that had been dismissed for default.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed in the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed in the interest of justice.
Supporting Evidence
The petition to condone delay is allowed as per Order in E.A 1/2023 in the Restoration Petition /Execution Application.

Judgment Evidence:

This petition is allowed in the interest of justice and Execution application is allowed. Restore Execution Petition 24/2022.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajan P.G.
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raju T.M.
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jobin T.T.
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Decree Holder
Advocate Name
Joy K. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition to restore the Execution Petition dismissed for default is allowed.
Evidence:
This petition is allowed in the interest of justice and Execution application is allowed. Restore Execution Petition 24/2022.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Mon, 07/24/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sreedevi Rajeswaran Nair et al regarding Execution of Decree
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between North Malabar Gramin Bank vs Aradhana S.H.G. et al regarding execution of decree
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The Manager, State Bank Of India vs P.S. Hari et al regarding execution of decree.
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between North Malabar Gramin Bank vs Aiswarya Self Help Group et al regarding execution of decree.
MUNSIFF COURT OF KANJIRAPPALLY
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Viswan S.H.G. et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won