Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
CS. 397/2021

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Rashida. E.V et al regarding settlement of judgment debt.

Court
Subordinate Judge, Koyilandy
Judge
Smt. Priyanka. V.S
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
Case Code No.
397
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Kerala Gramin Bank filed an execution petition against Rashida. E.V and Ammed. E.V regarding the settlement of a judgment debt. The court heard the matter and noted the defendants' absence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was closed temporarily with the provision to revive it if settlement does not materialize.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was closed temporarily with the provision to revive it if settlement does not materialize.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants approached the decree holder Bank for settlement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants approached the decree holder Bank for settlement.
Supporting Evidence
Decree holder filed memo stating that Judgment debtor approached decree holder Bank for settlement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of memo, EP is closed for time being, which liberty to revive if payment is not effected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rashida. E.V
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammed. E.V
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.K. Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Pravin. P.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.T. Sunitha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
EP is closed for time being with liberty to revive the same if payment is not effected.
Evidence:
In the light of memo, EP is closed for time being, which liberty to revive if payment is not effected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Case Code
CS.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Salin. K.K et al regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anuprasad.T et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF COMMERCIAL JUDGE, KOYILANDY
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shahin Muhammad et al regarding settlement of decree.
Commercial Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arjun Radhakrishnan et al regarding settlement of decree.
Court of the Judge, Commercial Court – Koyilandy
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Abhijith Sunny et al regarding satisfaction of decree
COURT OF THE JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT - KOYILANDY
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won