Case Summary
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Midhun.B. Manoj and another regarding a commercial matter. The plaintiff was absent during the final hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as both the plaintiff and their counsel were absent at the time of the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In there circumstances suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kerala Gramin Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Midhun.B. Manoj
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoj
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.K.Manoharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Subisha Ranjith.M.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anu.O.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and the counsel.
Evidence:
In there circumstances suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Midhun.B. Manoj et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Midhun.B. Manoj et al regarding dismissal for default.