Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1408/2018

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kavuvilakam JLG et al regarding the recovery of a loan amount.

Court
Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-7 years 1 month
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit against the defendants, a Joint Liability Group, to recover an outstanding loan amount. Despite several demands and legal notices, the defendants failed to repay the loan, resulting in the case being heard and a judgment delivered.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendants, having not appeared, were held liable for the debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of Rs.1,87,924/- along with 6% interest from the date of decree till realization and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendants, having not appeared, were held liable for the debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their case through uncontroverted testimony and relevant documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their case through uncontroverted testimony and relevant documents.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A8 documents the plaintiff had established his case warranting the grant of relief sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed with costs. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,87,924/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighty Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Four only) together with 6% interest from the date of decree till realisation and cost of the suit from the defendants and their assets both movable and immovable.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager Athira Thankappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kavuvilakam JLG
Relation
represented by its President /Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha .T
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o. Sivakumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o. Rajappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindu
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o. Aji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Murugan. M
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o. Maniyan
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Pronote, Take delivery letter to DPN, Consent cum Guarantee Cum Hypothication Agreement for JLG Loans, Account statement, Legal Notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. S. Reena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover an amount of Rs.1,87,924/- from the defendants along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit decreed with costs. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.1,87,924/- together with 6% interest from the date of decree till realisation and cost of the suit from the defendants and their assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application establishes the initial agreement for the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The pronote serves as evidence for the acknowledgment of the loan amount by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the delivery of the loan amount to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter to consent cum Guarantee Cum Hypothication Agreement for JLG Loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms and conditions under which the loan was granted, including guarantees.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The account statement shows the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice sent to the defendants for repayment of the loan highlights the plaintiff's attempts to recover the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The postal receipt serves as proof of sending the legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The A/D card provides confirmation of delivery of the legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kavuvilakam JLG et al regarding the recovery of a loan amount.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kavuvilakam JLG et al regarding the recovery of a loan amount.

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 08/30/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won