Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 829/2021

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jaya Unnikrishnan regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank, represented by its Branch Manager Meharlal S., filed a suit against Jaya Unnikrishnan for the realization of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan and was placed exparte in court proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 60,122/- to the plaintiff with future interest. The suit was decreed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 60,122/- with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 60,122/- to the plaintiff with future interest. The suit was decreed with costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 60,122/- (Rupees Sixty thousand One hundred and Twenty Two only) to the plaintiff with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaya Unnikrishnan @ Jayakumari
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan application, Acknowledgment of Debt, Copy of statement of account, Pronote, Original Take Delivery Letter to DPN, Original Agreement for Open cash Credit/retail credit card, Original Request for Overdraft Facilities, Letter issued by Ward member.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri R. Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kanjiramattom T.K. Siraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs. 60,122/- (Rupees Sixty thousand One hundred and Twenty Two only) to the plaintiff with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the loan agreement initiated by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the defendant's acknowledgment of the debt at various dates.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Statement of Account with Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides details on the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a formal promise by the defendant to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's claim regarding loan delivery.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Agreement for Open cash Credit/retail credit card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlines the terms of credit extended to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates additional facilities requested by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Letter issued by Ward member, Kudappanakunnu Grama Panchayath
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides community support or acknowledgment related to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Recovery and Rent Control
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jaya Unnikrishnan regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jaya Unnikrishnan regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 01/23/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayan. E et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won