Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.710/2025

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Fredi et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-11-26
Duration
approximately-10 years
Case Code No.
710
Case Closed
Wed, 11/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Kerala Gramin Bank is suing Fredi and Job, the legal heirs of the deceased Smt.Carmel.A, for recovery of a loan amount. The defendants have failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the defendants are liable to repay the outstanding loan amount to the plaintiff. The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹62,020/- with 6% interest from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the defendants are liable to repay the outstanding loan amount to the plaintiff. The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence established that the defendants defaulted in repayment of the loan as legal heirs of the deceased borrower.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 establishes that an amount of ₹62,020/- remains due in respect of the loan sanctioned by the plaintiff bank to the late Smt.Carmel.A. Considering the evidence and documents before this court, it is clear that the defendants are liable to pay the outstanding amount to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹62,020/- (Rupees Sixty-Two Thousand and Twenty only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager, Libin B. Thomas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fredi
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Job
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 13/11/2015, Original demand promissory note dated 13/11/2015, Original acknowledgment of debt signed by Smt.Carmel.A.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri R. Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kanjiramattom T.K. Siraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. P.S. Aswathy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of ₹62,020/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹62,020/- (Rupees Sixty-Two Thousand and Twenty only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
(b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original application for the loan amount sanctioned to Smt. Carmel.A.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This note is signed by Smt. Carmel.A as evidence of her obligation to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter relates to the loan sanctioned to Smt. Carmel.A.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This request pertains to the financial arrangements made by Smt. Carmel.A with the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original agreement for MSME Working Capital Limits – CC & OD
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement establishes the terms for the working capital limits provided to Smt. Carmel.A.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of debt and security of Borrower/Co-obligant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document includes multiple acknowledgments confirming debt from Smt. Carmel.A, establishing her liability.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original applications for MSE CC/OD renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These applications request renewals for the credit facilities previously extended to Smt. Carmel.A.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Original letter to be obtained from the borrower whenever a significant change in the signature is noticed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter relates to borrower identification and signature changes.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement shows the financial records indicating an outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of the Advocate notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice indicates the lawyer's communication regarding the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Original Loan Sanction Communication to Borrowers/Co-obligants/Guarantors
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document officially communicates the loan sanction to Smt. Carmel.A and relevant parties.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 11/13/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 11/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won