Case Summary
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank represented by its Branch Manager, Sheeja, and the respondent Ejas. T.V. The petition is related to the execution proceedings but the decree holder did not intend to proceed, leading to its dismissal for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the decree holder's submission that they do not intend to proceed with it.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder did not wish to pursue the execution petition.
The decree holder did not wish to pursue the execution petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder did not wish to pursue the execution petition.
The decree holder did not wish to pursue the execution petition.
Supporting Evidence
Submits that decree holder does not intend to proceed with this EP.
Judgment Evidence:
In the light of submission, EP is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kerala Gramin Bank
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ejas. T.V
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Anil.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP is dismissed for default as decree holder does not intend to proceed.
Evidence:
Steps not taken. Submits that decree holder does not intend to proceed with this EP. In the light of submission, EP is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Koyilandy
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2023