Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 9/2023

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ANNAKKUTTY et al regarding realization of money

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Nadapuram
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-1 year
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves KERALA GRAMIN BANK seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased borrower, Thomas Chacko. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to repay the loan, which has devolved upon them after the borrower's death.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest. The defendants were found liable to clear the debt incurred by the deceased.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.1,35,205/- with future interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest. The defendants were found liable to clear the debt incurred by the deceased.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the existence of the loan and the defaults by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has established that the loan amount was sanctioned to the deceased Thomas Chacko and that the defendants failed to repay the amount after his death, making them liable as legal heirs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs. The plaintiff bank is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,35,205/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Five Thousand Two Hundred and Five only) with future interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ANNAKKUTTY
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
NISHA
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
JAMES TOMS
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan agreement dated 11.08.2015, Acknowledgment of Debt dated 30.10.2017 and 18.01.2020
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sunny Kunnasseril
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. S. Vivek
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,35,205/- with future interest at 6%.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff bank is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,35,205/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Five Thousand Two Hundred and Five only) with future interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the loan agreement entered between the plaintiff bank and Sri. Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents serve as acknowledgments of debt executed by Thomas Chacko in favor of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2, Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the loan account of Thomas Chacko, reflecting transactions relevant to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Withdrawal Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the withdrawal signed by Thomas Chacko to withdraw Rs. 1,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document documents payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Withdrawal Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the withdrawal signed by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Withdrawal Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences another withdrawal by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Withdrawal Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the withdrawal signed by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Withdrawal Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows a withdrawal by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Withdrawal Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the withdrawal signed by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Common Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences payment made by Thomas Chacko to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Withdrawal Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows a withdrawal by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the declaration for review of KCC Limits submitted by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A20
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a tax receipt issued to Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A21
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a statement of account for Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A22
Document Type: Declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the declaration for review of KCC Limits submitted by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A23
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a tax receipt issued to Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A24
Document Type: Declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the declaration for review of KCC Limits submitted by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A25
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a tax receipt issued to Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A26
Document Type: Declaration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the declaration for review of KCC Limits submitted by Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A27
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a tax receipt issued to Thomas Chacko.
Reference:
Ext.A28

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ANNAKKUTTY et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ANNAKKUTTY et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Noushad. P. et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Akhil.C.R et al regarding recovery of loan amount
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Khairuneesa regarding realisation of money
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Mr.Jithin Krishna BR et al regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayakumar et al vs Kamala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Original Suit Plaintiff Won