Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 95/2025

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ANJANA CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves KERALA GRAMIN BANK and the defendants ANJANA CHANDRAN and CHANDRAN regarding the recovery of an educational loan amount. The defendants defaulted on the loan repayment, leading the bank to file the suit for the recovery of the owed amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed with costs in favor of the KERALA GRAMIN BANK, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with future interest. The demand for penal interest was denied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 9,30,825 ₹ (Rupees Nine Lakhs Thirty Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty Five Only) with future interest @ 14.25% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed with costs in favor of the KERALA GRAMIN BANK, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with future interest. The demand for penal interest was denied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants filed a conceding written statement agreeing to clear the decree debt within 6 months.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Since, the defendants filed a conceding written statement stating that, they are ready to clear off the decree debt within 6 months, the suit is hereby decreed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ANJANA CHANDRAN
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
CHANDRAN
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Pradeepan. U. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to realize an amount of 9,30,825 ₹ with future interest @ 14.25% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ANJANA CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ANJANA CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SURESH. K et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs DAVIS MATHEW regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MANU THOMAS regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. vs JASNA JOSEPH et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs RATHEESH. K regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won