Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 46/2024

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ananthi T et al regarding realization of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-9 years 4 months 7 days
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank seeking repayment of a loan amount from the defendants, Ananthi T and Reena R. The defendants defaulted on their loan despite the bank's demands for repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing them to recover the due amount from the defendants with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.51,010.24 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing them to recover the due amount from the defendants with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving its case with sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff succeeded in proving its case with sufficient evidence.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Ext. A1 to A11 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving him case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.51,010.24/- (Rupees Fifty one Thousand Ten and Twenty four Paise Only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realisation with costs from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ananthi T
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reena R
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 20/04/2016, loan sanction communication dated 27/04/2016, agreement for general consumption loans dated 27/04/2016, pronote for Rs.50,000/- dated 27/04/2016, copy of demand notice dated 04/01/2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abdul Khalam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayasree K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adhithya Leshmi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Niveditha P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was used to establish the initial request for financial assistance by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the approval of the loan amount by the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for General Consumption Loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement outlines the terms under which the loan was granted.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The pronote serves as an acknowledgment of the loan amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is related to the processing of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants to demand repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as proof of mailing the demand notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document demonstrates the defendants' acknowledgment of their debt.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another acknowledgment confirming the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement details the account history relevant to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Copy of Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides authority to the representative of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ananthi T et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ananthi T et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 04/20/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. vs Nazimudeen.A. regarding Realisation of Money
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Maharashtra et al vs Noorunnisa et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Karnataka Bank et al vs Riyas Hassan et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Indian Bank, Kadappakkada Branch vs Rasheed.H. @ Rasheedkutty et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Thulasi Swayam Sahaya Sangham et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won