Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.265/2018

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Aiyshath regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-17 years 1 day
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Aiyshath for the recovery of a loan amount after the defendant defaulted on repayment. The court found in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant's failure to adhere to the loan agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the claimed amount along with interest and costs. Aiyshath was found liable for the default in repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed to realise ₹1,37,313/- from the defendant and his assets with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the claimed amount along with interest and costs. Aiyshath was found liable for the default in repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence supported the plaintiff's claim as the defendant failed to repay the loan, and the plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendant owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,37,313/- from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aiyshath
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 29/11/2008, Memorandum of Agreement dated 29/11/2008, and other related documents.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.Reena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to recover ₹1,37,313/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to realise ₹1,37,313/- with interest at the rate of 16% per annum with monthly rests from the date of suit till date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 16% per annum.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 16% per annum with monthly rests from 15/02/2017 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Future Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant to avail the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Memorandum of Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment by the defendant of the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Application From the Borrowers
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document from the defendant requesting loan restructuring.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of undertaking from the borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Undertaking by the defendant regarding loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Restructured Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanction letter for the restructured loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Promise note executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the delivery of payment.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt and security of borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional acknowledgment regarding the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further acknowledgment of the debt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Overview of the defendant's account status.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice of demand served to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Aiyshath regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Aiyshath regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 11/29/2008 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won