Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1534/2022

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peringammala Branch vs Vizhinjam Vyapara Sree Swayam Sahaya Sangham Group No I-2 et al regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-8 years 10 months
Case Code No.
1534
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against the Vizhinjam Vyapara Sree Swayam Sahaya Sangham Group and its members for the repayment of a sanctioned loan amount. The defendants were placed exparte after failing to appear in court for the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount Rs.78,099/- (Rupees Seventy Eight thousand and Ninety Nine only) from the defendants jointly and severally with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount with interest from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved its case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence prove its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount Rs.78,099/- (Rupees Seventy Eight thousand and Ninety Nine only) from the defendants jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 13% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank Peringammala Branch
Relation
represented by Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vizhinjam Vyapara Sree Swayam Sahaya Sangham Group No I-2
Relation
represented by President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhi G.
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o Muthappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeja S.
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o John A.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jainy J.
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha S.
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o Sasikumar S.
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 28.12.2016, original pronote dated 28.12.2016, original Take delivery letter to DPN dated 28.12.2016, original acknowledgment of debt and security dated 19.10.2019, statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri R. Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kanjiramattom T.K Siraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount of Rs.78,099/- from the defendants jointly and severally.
Evidence:
Thus, the suit is decreed with costs and plaintiff is allowed to realise an amount Rs.78,099/- (Rupees Seventy Eight thousand and Ninety Nine only) from the defendants jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 13% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realisation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application dated 28.12.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original pronote dated 28.12.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of Take delivery letter to DPN dated 28.12.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original acknowledgment of debt and security dated 19.10.2019.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of account marked subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Inter-se Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Inter-se agreement dated 28.12.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Articles of agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Articles of agreement dated 28.12.2016.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of legal notice dated 30.06.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal acknowledgment cards (5 Nos.).
Reference:
Ext.A9 series
Document Type: Returned registered notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned registered notices (6 Nos.).
Reference:
Ext.A10 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 12/28/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s M.R.K Agency regarding realization of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Federal Bank Ltd vs Rohil. V et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won