Case Summary
Family suit for partition where plaintiffs sought division of family property but failed to appear in court resulting in the suit being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Safiya
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ayisha
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nafeesa
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subaida
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Razak
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hussain
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashraf
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yoonus
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- Child of Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Counsel for Plaintiff
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.C. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Counsel for Defendant
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking division of family property
Evidence:
Suit for partition. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Hence suit is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed's Children et al vs Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed's Children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed's Children et al vs Keezheparambatil Kunhi Mohammed's Children et al regarding partition