Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 35/2023

Case between Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers, K.N.Abdul Gafoor vs Rasputin Suiting Studio, Sasidharan Parayil regarding non-payment of court fee

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-07-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiffs Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers and its managing partner K.N.Abdul Gafoor against the defendants Rasputin Suiting Studio and its proprietor Sasidharan Parayil. The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint has been rejected for non-payment of court fees as both parties were absent and not represented at the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the required court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of court fee.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers (Age not specified years) Kasmisons Arcade (Near Padma Theatre), M.G.Road, Ernakulam – 682 035. K.N.Abdul Gafoor (Age not specified years) Kasmisons Arcarde (Near Padma Theatre) M.G.Road, Ernakulam – 682 035.

Defendants

Rasputin Suiting Studio (Age not specified years) B K M Complex, Opposite to Malabar Gold, Calicut road, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram – 679 322. Sasidharan Parayil (Age not specified years) B K M Complex, Opposite to Malabar Gold, Calicut road, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram – 679 322.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases