Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 35/2023

Case between Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers, K.N.Abdul Gafoor vs Rasputin Suiting Studio, Sasidharan Parayil regarding non-payment of court fee

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-07-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiffs Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers and its managing partner K.N.Abdul Gafoor against the defendants Rasputin Suiting Studio and its proprietor Sasidharan Parayil. The plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint has been rejected for non-payment of court fees as both parties were absent and not represented at the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint has been rejected for non-payment of court fees as both parties were absent and not represented at the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the required court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the required court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the required court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of court fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.N.Abdul Gafoor
Relation
Managing Partner
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasputin Suiting Studio
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasidharan Parayil
Relation
Proprietor
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Girijavallabhan P.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.Dinesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Akhil T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non-payment of court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non-payment of court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers, K.N.Abdul Gafoor vs Rasputin Suiting Studio, Sasidharan Parayil regarding non-payment of court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Kay Enn Distributors & Retailers, K.N.Abdul Gafoor vs Rasputin Suiting Studio, Sasidharan Parayil regarding non-payment of court fee

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won