Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn 2798/2016

Case between Kavungaparambil Ashraf vs Kavungaparambil Latheef and Subaida regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-06-29
Duration
1 year, 8 months, 22 days
Case Code No.
2798
Case Closed
Thu, 06/29/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Kavungaparambil Ashraf filed a restoration petition against respondents seeking to allow the case to proceed with an exemplary cost imposed on him.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration petition on the condition that the petitioner pays an exemplary cost of Rs.3000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed restoration petition with exemplary cost
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition on the condition that the petitioner pays an exemplary cost of Rs.3000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

This petition can only be allowed on exemplary cost. Hence stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.3000/- and pay the cost on or before 29-6-2017. Cost paid.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kavungaparambil Ashraf
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kavungaparambil Latheef
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subaida
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nazir Ahammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Kavungaparambil Latheef
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for 2
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of petition
Outcome: Allowed with exemplary cost
Description:
Restoration petition allowed with imposition of Rs.3000 exemplary cost.
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 11/09/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/29/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhamthodi Saidalavi vs Thekkethil Marakkar and Keyamthodi Kunhipathu regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dakshayani vs Moolethodi Ramachandran Nair regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Restoration petition Plaintiff Won
Case between N.K.Sanni vs Solaman Thomas regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Varikkottil Kunheethu vs Kunheethutty Haji regarding restoration petition
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won