Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 881/2023

Case between Kassam Moosa Sait Wakf Alal Aulad vs Asset Homes Pvt. Ltd. regarding temporary injunction

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kassam Moosa Sait Wakf Alal Aulad is seeking a temporary injunction against Asset Homes Pvt. Ltd. due to alleged construction activities that threaten the safety of a neighboring property. The lawsuit highlights concerns over damage and disruption caused by the defendant's construction work.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff due to insufficient evidence of a prima facie case and balance of convenience favoring the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and balance of convenience required for the granting of a temporary injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition for temporary injunction is dismissed. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the petition.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kassam Moosa Sait Wakf Alal Aulad (Age not specified years) B 8, DD Nest, Thammanam, Pullepady, Kathirikadav, Kaloor, Ernakulam – 682 017

Defendants

Asset Homes Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) No. XV/246C, "Asset Centrale", NH By pass Kundanoor Jn, Maradu P.O, Kochi, Kerala - 682 304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought a temporary injunction to stop construction activities by the defendant.
Evidence:
In view of the finding as regards points I to III, it can only be answered that the plaintiff is not entitled to an order of interim injunction as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These photographs are produced to show the condition of the building in the Plaint A Schedule Property.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report is filed on 22.03.2024 and is considered for the petition.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report is filed on 12.09.2025 and is also considered for the petition.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Wakf Board

Similar Cases