Case Summary
The plaintiff, KASAL INDIA Pvt Ltd, filed a suit against the defendants, Mini A A and Sivan M K, regarding the non-remittance of balance court fees. The court rejected the suit due to this reason.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- KASAL INDIA Pvt Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini A A
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivan M K
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Rajesh B, Authorised signatory
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rekha K B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C R Gayathri
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- E Jijobal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to balance court fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted. Hence, suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt Ltd vs Mini A A et al regarding Balance Court Fee not remitted.
Case Code Year
Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt Ltd vs Mini A A et al regarding Balance Court Fee not remitted.