Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 723/2013

Case between Karunakaran et al vs Kuttan et al regarding civil procedure

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Karunakaran and his family, filed a suit against the defendants, including Kuttan's family. The case was dismissed for default as neither party appeared in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default since neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were present to proceed with the case. All interim orders were vacated as a result.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default since neither the plaintiffs nor the defendants were present to proceed with the case. All interim orders were vacated as a result.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karunakaran
Party Age
80
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Venu K K
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o Late Karunakaran
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Madhu K K
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o Late Karunakaran
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ambili K K
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o M N Anil Kumar
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kala K K
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o Surendran A
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuttan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o Thevan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammini
Relation
W/o Late Kuttan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Relation
S/o Late Kuttan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saritha
Relation
D/o Late Kuttan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K R Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Yedhukrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kurian Manu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Loveline Vinu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Karunakaran et al vs Kuttan et al regarding civil procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Karunakaran et al vs Kuttan et al regarding civil procedure

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won