Case Summary
The suit for partition involved the genealogical relationship between plaintiffs and defendants, claiming a partition of properties obtained through various documents. A preliminary decree for partition was granted based on a lawful compromise agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
A preliminary decree for partition was granted, setting aside a previous partition deed based on a lawful compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The deed number 1938/1994 is set aside and a preliminary decree for partition is passed based on a lawful compromise agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
A preliminary decree for partition is passed accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhali
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Child of Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Avarankutty
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- Child of Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunheeru
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- Child of Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathummu
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- Child of Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainaba
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- Child of Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- Child of Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Partition deed document No.556/1959, document number 834/1973, document number 835/1973, document number 836/1973, document number 1037/1984, document number 592/1987, document number 1038/1984, partition deed document number 1938/1994
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Jiji.J.D.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Partition of plaint B schedule property into 9 equal shares by metes and bounds, with specific allocations to each party.
Evidence:
A preliminary decree for partition is passed accordingly.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
Case between Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed's children et al vs Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed's children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed's children et al vs Karinkappara Kunhimuhammed's children et al regarding partition