Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.322/2022

Case between Karikkamuri Resident’s Association vs Joy Mashnassery et al regarding cost non-payment

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Karikkamuri Resident’s Association, represented by C.D. Anilkumar, filed a suit against several defendants. The suit was heard but the defendants did not appear, leading to a judgment regarding payment of costs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The judgment was delivered in favor of the plaintiff regarding cost non-payment, leading to the closure of the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The judgment was delivered in favor of the plaintiff regarding cost non-payment, leading to the closure of the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff was awarded costs due to the defendant's absence and non-payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff was awarded costs due to the defendant's absence and non-payment.
Supporting Evidence
The judgment notes that the defendant was absent and had submitted no representation, thus leading to the order against them.

Judgment Evidence:

RP 93/23 was allowed upon payment of costs. Cost not paid. RP 93/23 closed for non-payment of costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karikkamuri Resident’s Association
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joy Mashnassery
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raaji Jayaraj
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Diljo Davis
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vidhyadharan.V.K.
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.J. Prasad
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.M. Joshi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Siji.K.Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bonny Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.P.Jubyraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Karikkamuri Resident’s Association vs Joy Mashnassery et al regarding cost non-payment
Case Code Year
Case between Karikkamuri Resident’s Association vs Joy Mashnassery et al regarding cost non-payment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won