Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 892/2023

Case between KARE Chemicals, Arun Kumar vs Xoplus Cleaning Solution, Noushad Kinalur regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
approximately-4 years 16 days
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, KARE Chemicals and Arun Kumar, are seeking payment for materials supplied to the defendants, Xoplus Cleaning Solution and Noushad Kinalur, who failed to pay the full invoice amounts. Despite repeated demands, the defendants did not make the payment, leading to the filing of this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.4,25,770/- along with interest. The defendants were held liable for the debt and costs associated with the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs.4,25,770/- along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.4,25,770/- along with interest. The defendants were held liable for the debt and costs associated with the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established that the defendants failed to pay for the materials supplied despite multiple demands.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established that the defendants failed to pay for the materials supplied despite multiple demands.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,25,770/-.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendants shall pay Rs.4,25,770/- (Rupees Four Lakhs twenty five thousand seven hundred and seventy only) along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiffs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KARE Chemicals
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arun Kumar
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Xoplus Cleaning Solution
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noushad Kinalur
Relation
Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Tax receipts and invoices dated 12.09.2020, 24.08.2020, 14.09.2020, 17.09.2020, 19.10.2020, 28.10.2020, GST Registration certificate, lawyer's notice, postal receipt, acknowledgment card, partnership deed.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lijin Thamban
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G S Krishnan Kartha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs sought to recover the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.4,25,770/- (Rupees Four Lakhs twenty five thousand seven hundred and seventy only) along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs claimed costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiffs are also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invoices representing the materials supplied by the plaintiffs to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A6
Document Type: GST Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate evidencing the GST registration of the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant regarding the outstanding payments.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt evidencing the dispatch of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card confirming receipt of the lawyer's notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the partnership of the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between KARE Chemicals, Arun Kumar vs Xoplus Cleaning Solution, Noushad Kinalur regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between KARE Chemicals, Arun Kumar vs Xoplus Cleaning Solution, Noushad Kinalur regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 08/20/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won