Case Summary
The petitioners, represented by Kandath, sought eviction of the respondent from a room due to rent arrears and to start a supermarket for livelihood.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction and vacant possession of the property
Case Type
Civil - Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court granted eviction and ordered respondent to vacate the property within one month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the bonafide need for starting a supermarket in the property and the respondent remained exparte, failing to challenge the evidence.
The petitioner proved the bonafide need for starting a supermarket in the property and the respondent remained exparte, failing to challenge the evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved the bonafide need for starting a supermarket in the property and the respondent remained exparte, failing to challenge the evidence.
The petitioner proved the bonafide need for starting a supermarket in the property and the respondent remained exparte, failing to challenge the evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The need of the petitioner is bonafide and the respondent failed to provide evidence to counter the claim.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed kutty
- Party Age
- 57
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aboobacker Sidheekh
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Party Age
- 53
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Yoosaf
- Party Age
- 51
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdurahman
- Party Age
- 49
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Vahid
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Registered Lawyer Notice dated 15-7-2017
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order for immediate eviction of the respondent and vacant possession of the property.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used against the respondent for non-payment of rent and eviction claim.
Reference:
A1 - Copy of Registered Lawyer Notice dated 15-7-2017
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil - Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kandath Moideen Haji's children et al vs Abdul Vahid et al regarding eviction and super market setup
Case Code Year
Case between Kandath Moideen Haji's children et al vs Abdul Vahid et al regarding eviction and super market setup