Case Summary
The suit for partition was filed by the plaintiffs, but due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation in court, the suit was dismissed with costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Kalathilparambil Fathima (45 years)
Triprangode amsom, Kainikkara desom, Tirur Taluk
Mariyakkutty (35 years)
Triprangode amsom, Kainikkara desom, Tirur Taluk
Ammayath Kondassery Eyyathumma (66 years)
Triprangode amsom, Kainikkara desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Subaida (41 years)
Triprangode amsom, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Partition of property among the legal heirs
Evidence:
Not mentioned