Case Summary
The Kalamassery Urban Co operative Society Ltd No. E1096 filed an execution petition against Shoukath and others for enforcement of a decree. The court dismissed the petition as not maintainable.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition as it was filed without the necessary certificate from the Registrar.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
O R D E R Decree Holder represented. Heard. E.P filed without Certificate of Registrar. Not maintainable. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Kalamassery Urban Co operative Society Ltd No. E1096
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shoukath
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazar K. E
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shemi Shoukath
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Luke J. Chirayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.G Sreejith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph Marvel Noronh A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Elsa Mary Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amal Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
E.P filed without Certificate of Registrar.
Evidence:
E.P filed without Certificate of Registrar. Not maintainable. Dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The Kalamassery Urban Co operative Society Ltd No. E1096 vs Shoukath et al regarding maintenance of an order
Case Code Year
Case between The Kalamassery Urban Co operative Society Ltd No. E1096 vs Shoukath et al regarding maintenance of an order