Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No.37 OF 2018

Case between Kakkottil Rukhiya vs Kakkottil Kadeeja et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-26
Duration
12 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed a suit for partition seeking separate allotment of shares over a property originally owned by Kakkottil Beevi and her descendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition, allotting 93 shares to the plaintiff and 21 shares to the defendants in the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property and allotment of shares
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Defendant No. 2 filed a written statement admitting the plaintiff's claim for partition, leading to the decree in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 114 equal shares by meets and bounds. The plaintiff is entitled to get 93 shares out of 114 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property. The defendants are entitled to get 21 shares together out of 114 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kakkottil Rukhiya (39 years) Tirur Taluk, Tirur amsom & Post Kott desom

Defendants

Kakkottil Kadeeja (52 years) Cheriyamundam amsom Thalakkadathur desom, Ovungal Kakkottil Ummukulsu (46 years) Thanalur amsom desom, Kelappuram, Tirur Taluk Kakkottil Subaida (42 years) Thanalur amsom desom, Parengath, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of property and allotment of shares
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 114 equal shares by meets and bounds. The plaintiff is entitled to get 93 shares out of 114 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property. The defendants are entitled to get 21 shares together out of 114 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing relationship and ownership history of the property
Reference:
Doc. No.1338/1965
Document Type: Certified copy of decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Providing details of the previous decree for partition
Reference:
OS 53/2010
Document Type: Joint right release Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documenting transfer of shares in the property
Reference:
No.2114/15

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 06/18/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases