Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
C.S No. 3/2025

Case between Kairali Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs P.J Chacko et al regarding balance court fee remittance

Court
COMMERCIAL COURT, PALA
Judge
Smt.Rajasree Rajgopal
Order Date
2025-10-21
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 10/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kairali Impex Pvt. Ltd. is the plaintiff represented by Mr. Shihabudeen C.R. The case involves a suit where the balance court fee was not remitted despite repeated opportunities, leading to rejection of the plaint.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaint was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted despite repeated opportunities given to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted despite repeated opportunities given to the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kairali Impex Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.J Chacko
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Marita Joseph
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Joshy Zacharia
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Mary Joseph
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K R Sreenivasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S Rajesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-remitted balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance court fee not remitted despite repeated opportunities. Hence plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kairali Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs P.J Chacko et al regarding balance court fee remittance
Case Code Year
Case between Kairali Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs P.J Chacko et al regarding balance court fee remittance

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Pala
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 10/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Lilly Thomas vs John Alexander et al regarding Restoration Petition.
Commercial Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd. vs Jomy K Jose and Reny Jose regarding restoration of ex parte judgment and decree.
COMMERCIAL COURT , SUB JUDGE, PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Edison John vs K C Varghese et al regarding correction of clerical error
Court of the Sub Judge, Pala
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between EDISON JOHN vs K C VARGHESE et al regarding court fee remittance and case dismissal
Commercial Court, Pala
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Poornendhu Enterprises vs Juby Stigi et al regarding dismissal of suit.
COMMERCIAL COURT, PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won