Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 122 OF 2014

Case between Kadalayi Hussain et al vs Koyassan Haji regarding mandatory injunction and damages for use and occupation

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2016-03-15
Duration
1 year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs, including Kadalayi Hussain and Bushra, sought a mandatory injunction to evict the defendant from the property along with damages for unauthorized occupation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs were granted a decree for a mandatory injunction directing the defendant to vacate the property and pay damages for use and occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory Injunction and Damages for Use and Occupation
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kadalayi Hussain (59 years) Residing at Valavannur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Bushra (43 years) W/o. Kadalayi Hussain @ Bava Haji Ahammad Kabeer (24 years) Residing at Valavannur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Koyassan Haji (58 years) Melethil House, Naduvattom amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directed defendant to vacate the property within a month.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today.
Relief Type: Damages for Use and Occupation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs allowed to realize damages at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per month from 10.1.2012.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within a period of one month from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Registered lawyer with acknowledgment card
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal acknowledgment card
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply notice
Reference:
A3

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 03/15/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases