Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 87/2009

Case between K.A.Asharaf vs M.D.Somanathan et al regarding case dismissal for default

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-09-09
Duration
approximately-15 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves K.A.Asharaf as the plaintiff against M.D.Somanathan and others as defendants. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of a submitted petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide a necessary petition for its continuation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file a petition to pursue the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for the reason stated above the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K.A.Asharaf (53 years years) “Sharon” Kavanaadu veedu, vaakkattu road, chakaraparambu desom, Punithura village.

Defendants

M.D.Somanathan (58 years years) “Sambu Sadanam”, Shastha temple road, Kumbalanghi vazhi, Palluruthi, Kochi - 6 Corporation of Kochi (Age not specified years) office of the Corporation of Kochi – Park Avenue, Ernakulam, Kochi – 682 011. Sarojini (Age not specified years) Nadavanathil house, Cherthala Muncipality No. 16/2, Cherthala South village. Venugopalan Unni (Age not specified years) Priya Bhavan, Palluruthy, Thekkemury, Palluruthy, Edakochi village. Gangadharan (Age not specified years) Nedumparambumana, Vadake madom, Thripunithura Desom, Nadama village.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, for the reason stated above the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2009 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases