Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 122/2012

Case between K.A Ibrahimkunju vs Soon Sudhakaran et al regarding compliance with direction to implead necessary party.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-09
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 10/09/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.A Ibrahimkunju filed a suit against Soon Sudhakaran and Veliyil Engineering regarding compliance with court directions. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to comply with the necessary steps to implead a party.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's case was dismissed due to non-compliance with the court's directions to implead a necessary party. The plaintiff did not present themselves or take steps as directed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's case was dismissed due to non-compliance with the court's directions to implead a necessary party. The plaintiff did not present themselves or take steps as directed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not comply with court direction.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not comply with court direction.
Supporting Evidence
the plaintiff has not complied with direction to implead a necessary party to suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.A Ibrahimkunju
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soon Sudhakaran
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veliyil Engineering
Party Age
59
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. P Aravindakshan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mujeebrahiman P. M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. B Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with the direction to implead a necessary party.
Evidence:
Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.A Ibrahimkunju vs Soon Sudhakaran et al regarding compliance with direction to implead necessary party.
Case Code Year
Case between K.A Ibrahimkunju vs Soon Sudhakaran et al regarding compliance with direction to implead necessary party.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/09/2024 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won