Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 168/2010

Case between K.A. Antony vs Soonam Jose regarding rent control petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-11-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.A. Antony filed a rent control petition against Soonam Jose regarding rent arrears. The respondent deposited the rent arrears before the court, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent had deposited the rent arrears in court, and the petitioner was allowed to withdraw the amount deposited.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The respondent complied with the requirement of depositing rent arrears, which led to the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

The rent control petition is dismissed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

K.A. Antony (68 years years) Kalluveettil House, Jaison Building, P.T. Usha road, Ernakulam-11

Defendants

Soonam Jose (56 years years) Erasseril House, residing at Kaloor P.O., Ernakulam Doing business at A 2 Z Sanitary Wares, P.T. Usha road, Ernakulam, Kochi-11

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petitioner is not pressing the rent control petition due to the respondent depositing the rent arrears.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court, he is not pressing the rent control petition.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases