Case Summary
K.A. Antony filed a rent control petition against Soonam Jose regarding rent arrears. The respondent deposited the rent arrears before the court, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed as the respondent had deposited the rent arrears in court, and the petitioner was allowed to withdraw the amount deposited.
Key Reasoning:
The respondent complied with the requirement of depositing rent arrears, which led to the dismissal of the petition.
The respondent complied with the requirement of depositing rent arrears, which led to the dismissal of the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The respondent complied with the requirement of depositing rent arrears, which led to the dismissal of the petition.
The respondent complied with the requirement of depositing rent arrears, which led to the dismissal of the petition.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court, he is not pressing the rent control petition.
Judgment Evidence:
The rent control petition is dismissed accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K.A. Antony
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soonam Jose
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.C. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.A. Shaji Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P. Rexy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Basil Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petitioner is not pressing the rent control petition due to the respondent depositing the rent arrears.
Evidence:
The counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondent has deposited the rent arrears before court, he is not pressing the rent control petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K.A. Antony vs Soonam Jose regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between K.A. Antony vs Soonam Jose regarding rent control petition